NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you give an opinion of a person or company your full name needs to be in your post. Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #501  
Old 02-21-2016, 04:19 PM
Cliff Bowman's Avatar
Cliff Bowman Cliff Bowman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near Atlanta
Posts: 622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D. Broughman View Post
Roy Face
Speaking of Roy Face, there is supposed to be a recurring 1967 Topps Roy Face printing error that is partially missing his name on the back of the card. I have heard of this card and seen it in want lists but have never actually seen evidence of one. I have also heard of, but never seen, 1959 Gus Triandos missing stats on the back, 1965 Turk Farrell with a large ink blob on the front of the card, and 1975 Ken Sanders with a large brown area in the lower left corner. If anyone has one of these, please post a photo of it.
Reply With Quote
  #502  
Old 02-21-2016, 04:29 PM
irv's Avatar
irv irv is offline
D@le Irv*n
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 3,279
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALR-bishop View Post
Long time recognized "variation". There are also some partial black stars out there, and versions with partial missing front borders. They have some hobby recognition but are not part of the PSA registry master list and so do not carry as big a premium as the black star
Thanks.

Guess those bidding on the card I posted think it is something special based on what they are bidding on the card for.

No harm in trying to bump it up I guess??
Reply With Quote
  #503  
Old 03-01-2016, 03:07 PM
rgpete rgpete is offline
Ron
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Eastern N. Carolina ( New Jersey Born and Raised)
Posts: 721
Default

1928 Harrington's with and without the apostrophe. Also the backs can be different by an extra offer
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Ruth 001.jpg (82.2 KB, 200 views)
File Type: jpg auction.jpg (57.8 KB, 202 views)
Reply With Quote
  #504  
Old 03-01-2016, 08:12 PM
begsu1013 begsu1013 is offline
Bob Ev@ns
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,527
Default

just picked this up. lower left quarter panel is entirely white...

Reply With Quote
  #505  
Old 03-02-2016, 11:42 AM
variation-man variation-man is offline
member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Default

looks like it sat in the sun and is faded
Reply With Quote
  #506  
Old 03-02-2016, 12:28 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 5,215
Default Variants

Finally we have a real variation man in this thread

....welcome
Reply With Quote
  #507  
Old 03-03-2016, 03:19 PM
variation-man variation-man is offline
member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Default

thanks I do many variations and the miscut, faded, etc. are not variations. those are factory errors and mainly worthless. example of a true variation is the 1967 bolin white streak. a miscut card of a 1968 johnny bench rookie card showing half his face is worth zero unless you use it as a conversation piece showing on how bad quality control was back then.
Reply With Quote
  #508  
Old 03-03-2016, 04:51 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 5,215
Default Variation

What is your personal definition of a "true variation " ? Do you think the Bolin was an intentionally corrected error or an unintended recurring print defect, and in either event how could one tell....or does it matter ?
Reply With Quote
  #509  
Old 03-03-2016, 08:40 PM
Cliff Bowman's Avatar
Cliff Bowman Cliff Bowman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near Atlanta
Posts: 622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALR-bishop View Post
Do you think the Bolin was an intentionally corrected error or an unintended recurring print defect, and in either event how could one tell....or does it matter ?
+1. Nearly all of the 1967 Topps "variation" cards are actually just printing flaw error cards. These include the frontal errors of Bolin, Spiezio, Nen, G. Brown, and the back errors of Marichal, Queen, Belinsky, Phillies Rookie Stars, and Gomez.
Reply With Quote
  #510  
Old 03-04-2016, 10:35 AM
variation-man variation-man is offline
member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 8
Default

The 1967 cards I agree that they are "printing flaws" but they we corrected. I do not recognize such errors as miscuts, print dots or faded. if the printing company made a correction, then I believe it is a variation - 1969 white letters - 1966 purple tree Heffner. this could be argued all day long.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1966 Topps High # Print Variations 4reals Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 9 04-27-2014 08:05 PM
Are these variations or print defects? savedfrommyspokes Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 16 02-09-2013 01:52 PM
Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? novakjr Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 9 01-28-2011 06:32 PM
Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) shammus Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 8 09-03-2010 09:58 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 AM.


ebay GSB