NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you give an opinion of a person or company your full name needs to be in your post. Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-01-2011, 12:12 PM
tachyonbb tachyonbb is offline
Bruce Esser
member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Omaha
Posts: 134
Default Physics of Cheating in Baseball

The June 2011 issue of the American Journal of Physics has an article titled: "Corked bats, juiced balls and humidors, The physics of cheating in baseball".

Alan Nathan from U of Illinois, Lloyd Smith from Washington State and Dan Russell from Kettering University are the authors.

They corked a bat and tested its coefficient of restitution and discovered that a corked bat has no advantage when compared to a normal bat.

They tested baseball's from the 1970's (from Charles Finley estate). American League balls by Rawlings and signed by MacPhail. They compared these to Rawlings balls made in 2004. They also reviewed the tests done in 1998-2000 and those done by the Cleveland Plain Dealer. Bottom line was that there was no significant difference in the coefficient of restitution with the different baseballs. The limited number of samples to test made any definitive statement impossible.

The last test was using the humidor like the one used at Coors field. They concluded that the humidor is effective in reducing the distance a baseball will fly.

I have provided a synopsis of the article. If you want more details let me know. The article is online but you have to have a subscription to view the article.
__________________
Interested in Nebraska Minor League Baseball Memorabilia.

http://www.nebaseballhistory.com/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-01-2011, 01:34 PM
alanu's Avatar
alanu alanu is offline
Alan U
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 641
Default

I wonder how they tested the corked bat.

If they used the same swing speed I would imagine it wouldn't help much, but my understanding is that the way the corked bat works is that it makes the bat lighter to improve swing speed.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-02-2011, 08:54 AM
tachyonbb tachyonbb is offline
Bruce Esser
member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Omaha
Posts: 134
Default

They did increase the velocity of the bat for the corked bat. The velocity was higher, but the mass of the bat was less which pretty much cancelled the effect of the higher velocity.

The corked bat did not have a better Coefficient of Restitution when compared to the original bat. There is no "trampoline" effect from the corked bat like there was with college metal bats. More bat speed but less mass resulted in the corked bat performance being a little less than the original bat.

One other possibility that the authors mentioned is that with the lighter bat the hitter could wait longer on the pitch before committing to swing. "That is, in the parlance of baseball the batter can "get around quicker", allowing the batter to wait longer on the pitch as well as more easily adjust the swing after the swing has already begun"
"So while corking may not allow a batter to hit the ball farther, it may well allow a batter to hit the ball solidly more often."
__________________
Interested in Nebraska Minor League Baseball Memorabilia.

http://www.nebaseballhistory.com/
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-05-2011, 08:46 AM
steve B steve B is offline
Steve Birmingham
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: eastern Mass.
Posts: 4,922
Default

I don't buy their ideas about the corked bat. I can see where it wouldn't have any effect at the same speed, but increasing the bat speed has to have a positive effect. Kinetic energy is half the mass times velocity squared.
So you'd have to have a very large change in mass to offset a decent change in bat speed.

Did they test with actual pro caliber players swinging? There's a huge difference between what they can do and the rest of us. Personally I use as heavy a bat as I can find because my hands will only move so fast. I've played with a couple people who had some real athletic ability and they both used very light bats, and couldn't hit as well with mine. One guy hit a limited flight softball pitched slow pitch roughly 350ft! the bat was something like 31oz, almost a little league bat. And he didn't finish college ball.(Had to choose baseball or enginering and chose engineering, but we all know the odds...)

Steve B
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
When Technology and Pre-War baseball collide Leon Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 9 05-09-2011 05:02 AM
Great Article @ Baseball Autograph Fraud danc Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 11 05-07-2009 08:11 PM
Baseball QUestions Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 26 08-02-2006 07:18 AM
A short baseball story for your reading enjoyment Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 6 11-20-2004 07:50 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:09 PM.


ebay GSB